I noticed my two years time, but I read another book by Robert Walser. El Paseo is not as spectacular as Gunter von Jacob, however, has the same taste to bring up anything that is not enrolled in History with a capital initial. Want to elapse between the lives of others was considered irrelevant enough to enhance his narrative voice.
Someone once told me never to be a writer because this was due to have a big enough ego to impose a reader who wants what you have is relevant and worth reading. Robert Walser wouldIf it contradicts itself. I will not deny that I also have a very strong, yet is always apologizing to his readers. As a pushover who is accountable for existing. Also, never pretended that everything he wrote was read on a massive scale. His texts, trapped in this case attached to it, were not written, ultimately, to be read. I think that might be considered anti-texts and be read is not the denial of every word written.
Like him, many are hiding, they hate the world around them because they can not be so naive. SBut that disgust in love does not prevent certain aspects. And it has to be very optimistic about them. Because if you accept that it is so insignificant in the world, how about from one part of it? What difference does the voice of one versus the other? "Faced with the rich? "Faced with the winners? "Faced with the unwrapped? "Compared with those who are not in question? What matters and what right?
0 comments:
Post a Comment